[openib-general] [DAPL] ran kdapl test, got slab corruption

Tom Duffy tduffy at sun.com
Fri Apr 29 10:32:38 PDT 2005


On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 06:31 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> I don't need to do this on x64_64. Not sure why. Could this be due to a
> compiler difference ? I am using gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat
> 3.4.2-6.fc3). I also build "in tree" rather that out of tree.

I am building out of tree, using gcc 4.0 on a 2.6.12-rc3 based tree.

> Do you know if the DREQ actually has been sent on IB ?

How would I verify this?

> Is this associated with the above (quit test) ?

yes

> Can this be reproduced ?

I will try again.  You can try by turning on SLAB debugging in the
kernel build.

> I will inspect the code to see how this could occur. Is it between 2
> x86_64 machines ?

Yes, back to back running opensm on one of the nodes.

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050429/372c238f/attachment.sig>


More information about the general mailing list