[openib-general] [PATCH 1/2] kDAPL: remove inline functions
Tom Duffy
Thomas.Duffy.99 at alumni.brown.edu
Thu Aug 4 11:22:49 PDT 2005
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 20:30 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> >This is almost exactly what is there now. Not really a change. I don't like
> > the multiple indirections to get to the function table, but this can be simplified later.
>
> Indeed, it can be simplified a little, but why not having this simplification in the kdapl
> registry level ("dat") as it is in ib_core calling ib_verbs and libibverbs calling libmthca,
> while the verbs consumer does not have to go into those indirections at all but rather
> just call a well understood/defined api? are you suggesting to apply such a chance also
> to the verbs?
I don't understand what you mean? What change would happen in verbs?
-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050804/83382672/attachment.sig>
More information about the general
mailing list