[openib-general] Re: uverbs comp events
    Roland Dreier 
    rolandd at cisco.com
       
    Fri Aug 19 12:09:31 PDT 2005
    
    
  
    Sean> I'm leaning more towards Arlin's thinking on this, but
    Sean> whatever is decided, I think that uCM and uAT should match.
Doesn't this seem like a good argument against adding support for
synthetic events?  We already have a perfectly good mechanism for
generating fd events (namely pipe() + write()), so why do we want to
add three more mechanisms for generating synthetic events?
 - R.
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list