[openib-general] Re: uverbs comp events
Roland Dreier
rolandd at cisco.com
Fri Aug 19 12:09:31 PDT 2005
Sean> I'm leaning more towards Arlin's thinking on this, but
Sean> whatever is decided, I think that uCM and uAT should match.
Doesn't this seem like a good argument against adding support for
synthetic events? We already have a perfectly good mechanism for
generating fd events (namely pipe() + write()), so why do we want to
add three more mechanisms for generating synthetic events?
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list