[openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] Initial trunk checkin of ISERinitiator

[Yaron Haviv]

> 
> Also on the IB side the AT code probably needs to be reviewed and
> improved.  The API should be simpler, and I don't like the way AT
> sticks its tentacles into the IPoIB driver and network stack.
> 

The AT implementation was based on the code from SDP 
I assume that similar changes as the ones you propose would need to
apply to SDP, or SDP would need to use the same lib as the other ULPs 

Yaron