[openib-general] RDMA connection and address translation API
Roland Dreier
rolandd at cisco.com
Wed Aug 24 11:02:52 PDT 2005
Fab> Why can't the IPV field be ignored? If a listen wants only
Fab> IPV4 addresses, it would specify a 16-byte compare buffer
Fab> with the first 12 bytes zero, the next 4 filled with the IPV4
Fab> address, and would set the offset to that of the hello
Fab> message's destination address (32).
Yes, you're right for SDP. I guess if we're comfortable mandating
that all protocols put their source and destination IPs in the private
data for the IB case, then this works. Of course it's somewhat
awkward to pass this information into the transport-neutral CM API but
I think this can be worked around.
Roland> What makes it really ugly is that it's perfectly
Roland> reasonable for one consumer to listen to a service at
Roland> 192.168.11.12 and another consumer to listen to the same
Roland> service at 192.168.98.99. How do we handle this in the IB
Roland> case??
Fab> As long as the service IP address (the local address on the
Fab> listening side) is always advertised in the same place in the
Fab> private data, this isn't a problem. The compare lengths and
Fab> offsets would be identical for both services, but the compare
Fab> buffer contents would differ. Did I miss what you were
Fab> getting at?
No, I think I confused myself. As long as the CM can get at the IP
information, it can figure out which consumer is which.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list