[openib-general] RE: Connection and Address Translation
James Lentini
jlentini at netapp.com
Wed Aug 24 14:22:06 PDT 2005
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> As long as the "unspecified" local address remains a valid option
> the proposed API split is defnitely implementable under iWARP. But
> it is obviously simpler to just keep the same semantics as the
> exported kDAPL interface. Is there a definite benefit to making the
> change, if so what and for which middleware/application?
What is "the change" you are refering to?
More information about the general
mailing list