[openib-general] [PATCH][iWARP] Added provider CM verbs and queryprovider methods
Sean Hefty
sean.hefty at intel.com
Wed Aug 24 23:50:07 PDT 2005
>> Why include the connection protocol as part of the verbs
>> layer? Granted I
>> haven't looked at the iWarp specs in a long time, but I don't remember
>> connection establishment being part of the verbs.
>
>Connection management is not part of the RDMAC verbs, however, we need
>some
>way for transports to "hook in" to the CM. The other approach is to have
>a separate registration mechanism for connection management verbs, but
>this seemed a little bizarre, so we just extended the provider verbs.
>
>Ideas?
I need to reacquaint myself with iWarp more, but I don't like the idea of adding
CM calls as part of the verbs API, and in particular as part of a generic RDMA
device structure.
Does this suggest that each iWarp device driver will need to implement a
connection establishment protocol? Isn't there a way to generalize that into a
single iWarp CM module that can sit above multiple devices? How will
connections between different devices be supported?
I'm assuming that the Linux kernel will never permit an established connection
to be offloaded onto a NIC. However it seems possible that a new iWarp
connection could be done in a common way, with the result passed into the device
through the modify QP call as the LLP stream.
- Sean
More information about the general
mailing list