[openib-general] Re: RMPP Message Format Errors
Eitan Zahavi
eitan at mellanox.co.il
Sat Aug 27 08:14:49 PDT 2005
Sean Hefty wrote:
>
> I believe that the 220 byte payload length is for all RMPP MADs. Only the
> common and RMPP header lengths are ignored.
Yes.
>
>
>
>>Doesn't it need to account for a "partial" rather than full last segment
>>transferred data in the first segment length ?
Yes I think it needs to use the partial length.
>
>
> What I couldn't easily tell from the spec is whether a partial last segment is
> included in the initial payload length or not. I read it as: "PayloadLength
> counts all the bytes in the TransferredData field of the DATA packet format."
> In my interpretation, partial data is indicated by the PayloadLength field in
> the last segment only. It's quite possible that my interpretation is incorrect,
> in which case the calculation in the RMPP code is off.
I agree the text might be missing an example or two for clarification.
Anyway, we probably can use the IB Analyzer as the ultimate
interpretation test. Note that there are IB implementations that uses
the first segment payload length as the source of packet length and
count on it to represent the correct DATA length.
We can take your interpretation to discussion in the IBTA MGTWG for
further discussion.
Is the effort for fixing it big?
Thanks
Eitan
More information about the general
mailing list