[openib-general] [PATCH fixed] was Re: [PATCH] ipoib_multicast/ipoib_mcast_send race
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at mellanox.co.il
Mon Dec 12 03:03:50 PST 2005
Quoting Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2 at in.ibm.com>:
> stop_thread()
> {
> clear_bit();
> lock(); /* empty lock/unlock to synchronize with the mcast_send() */
> unlock(); /* make the other routine FINISH before we start other activity */
> ...
> ...
> }
> mcast_send()
> {
> lock();
> if (test_bit)
> ...
> ...
> unlock();
> }
I think this will work, too. But I have easier time reasoning about locks than
barriers and atomic operations. "bit is protected by priv->lock" is a simple
rule, and we are not on data path here.
The fact that the race went unnoticed for a while validates this approach
in my eyes.
--
MST
More information about the general
mailing list