[openib-general] [RFC] IB_AT_MOST

[Sean Hefty]

Fab Tillier wrote:
> I don't understand the IB_AT_MOST macro.  If someone uses IB_AT_MOST( 1 ) and
> the hardware supports 4, they will get 4, which is definitely not "at most 1".
> 
> I would rename it to IB_MAX, and define it a -1 or something like that.

I agree with Fab.  What the user wants is the maximum that they can get, and 
IB_MAX conveys this better than IB_AT_MOST.

- Sean