[openib-general] RFC on SDP checkin
Tom Duffy
tduffy at sun.com
Fri Feb 4 11:33:18 PST 2005
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:21 -0800, Libor Michalek wrote:
> 3) Since the rest of the tree is not destabilized or effected in
> any other way by the code, just check it into tree itself.
> (e.g. gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/sdp)
>
> Anyone have thoughts on this? Personally I'm leaning towards #3,
> but that's because it's the least amount of work for me. :)
I would like #3 as well. Libor, would it be possible to get a preview
of what is going to be checked in? Maybe with a small one-pager about
how to use it, etc?
Thanks,
-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050204/bdcb6907/attachment.sig>
More information about the general
mailing list