FW: [openib-general] Minutes from DAPL BOF at OpenIB Workshop
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Thu Feb 10 09:46:16 PST 2005
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:43:07AM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 10:38 -0700, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> > we're back into the "we did a spec, so the code can't change" loop.
> > burn the spec in your fireplace or wood stove
>
> Fair enough, the spec isn't a gold standard. But, let's not burn the
> baby as well. Why don't we clean up the code and see where it gets us?
> Incremental changes to a working implementation seem far more palatable
> than slash-and-burn.
Maybe you should lay down the requirement first.
- why do we need an intermediate API
- what differences does it
- what devices does it abstract
- what are the users
More information about the general
mailing list