[openib-general] RFC on SDP checkin
Sean Hefty
mshefty at ichips.intel.com
Fri Feb 11 11:32:13 PST 2005
Sean Hefty wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>
>> Hal> Don't we want to be a little bit careful here in terms of
>> Hal> being able to continue to derive patches on the pieces
>> Hal> already submitted to kernel.org until we decide this is ready
>> Hal> to go forward ? (Guess that might be when these build patches
>> Hal> would be applied).
>>
>> Tom> Well, I don't think the Makefiles ore Kconfig's will be
>> Tom> changing for upstream submission, so as long as Roland is
>> Tom> careful to only diff .[ch] files that are already in lkml, it
>> Tom> shouldn't be a big deal. I think for the ease of use for
>> Tom> everybody that we plumb in cm and sdp.
>>
>> Agreed. It's pretty easy for me to keep Kconfig/Makefile changes
>> straight now that we have the current stuff upstream. I see no
>> problem with hooking up the CM and SDP. (BTW it looks like SDP should
>> select the CM once there is a CM config option; also the SDP
>> dependency on INET is redundant because IPOIB alread depends on that)
>
>
> Libor, if you want to include the changes for the CM as part of your SDP
> changes, feel free to do so. Otherwise, I will submit a patch for the
> CM as soon as possible.
I've committed a patch to include the CM as part of the core build.
- Sean
More information about the general
mailing list