[openib-general] Re: FW: summary of my understanding on our c ommon work on openib.org

[Tziporet Koren]

1. This attribute is not used also by gen1 code and we checked with
customers.
2. It is not useful since on RQ there any logical flow will work with
completions.

Tziporet

-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Grundler [mailto:iod00d at hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:25 PM
To: openib-general at openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: FW: summary of my understanding on our
common work on openib.org


Offline, I exchange email with Roland about this attribute.
Seems like we want to know the answer to these questions:

o is there any code outside of openib.org using this attribute?
o if so, how useful is it?

Roland is certain none of the protocols in the proprietary Topspin stack
uses this feature.

The reasons roland gave all seemed valid for removal except the fact
the product has been shipping for a while and thus it's available to
users regardless of if mellanox supports it or not.
It's reasonable to remove if no one can show a use case.

grant
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general at openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050214/0e6d76bb/attachment.html>