[openib-general] [PATCH] (repost) no qp lock on poll, separate sq/rq locks

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Roland Dreier <roland at topspin.com>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] (repost) no qp lock on poll, separate sq/rq locks
> 
>     Michael> You seem to assume that each completion is for exactly
>     Michael> one wqe.  How does this work for selective signaling?
> 
> Oh crap, back to the drawing board again...
> 
>  - R.
> 

I also have to say I dont object to the renaming of next to next_ind,
but I think last_comp is more descriptive than tail.

-- 
MST - Michael S. Tsirkin