[openib-general] OpenSM died a horrible death

[shaharf]

Hi Tom,

 Can you send me the original mail concerning the SM horrible death? It
was corrupted in our Exchange or it was very large (over 5 MB). If you
want to send very large log files, please send it tared and zipped. If
it is only local Exchange problem (praise Bill), then please just resend
it.

 

Anyhow, I missed the exact context that it happened. From the below
email I got the impression that it occurred after get path record with
dest=null. I didn't find any relevant assert in the code, and I also
issued synthetic path record with dest gid = 0 and it works (return
status 500). 

 

Eitan - where is this assert that you think it hit?

 

I know that it is assert but did anyone understand from where? It should
be written in the log, and in the panic message and you can get it using
a gdb. The process should enter a tight loop to enable to debug it with
gdb. The dump of the backtrace (bt) of the gdb will be very helpful. 

 

Shahar

 

________________________________

From: openib-general-bounces at openib.org
[mailto:openib-general-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Eitan Zahavi
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:50 AM
To: Hal Rosenstock; Tom Duffy
Cc: openib-general at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openib-general] OpenSM died a horrible death

 

OpenSM asserts on guid=0x0000000000000000 

EZ 

[Hal] >It looks like it died shortly after the following error: 
[Hal] >[1104994208:000136814][43005960] -> __osm_pr_rcv_get_end_points:
No source [Hal] >port with GUID = 0x0000000000000000

 

_______________________________________________ 
openib-general mailing list 
openib-general at openib.org 
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general 

To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050106/6209c5a8/attachment.html>