[openib-general] osm in openib

[Ronald G. Minnich]

[1105400337:000955212][95E128E0] -> OpenSM Rev:openib-1.0.0
[1105400337:000956454][95E128E0] -> osm_opensm_init: Forcing single threaded dispatcher.
[1105400337:000957121][95E128E0] -> osm_report_notice: Reporting Generic Notice type:3 num:66 from LID:0x0000 GUID:0xfe80000000000000,0x0000000000000000
[1105400337:000957143][95E128E0] -> osm_report_notice: Reporting Generic Notice type:3 num:66 from LID:0x0000 GUID:0xfe80000000000000,0x0000000000000000
[1105400337:000959564][95E128E0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr: assign CA  0x55fd24ort 1 guid (0x2c90108a03e61) as the default port.
[1105400337:000959765][95E128E0] -> osm_sm_mad_ctrl_bind: Binding to port 0x2c90108a03e61.
[1105400337:000959779][95E128E0] -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port 0x2c90108a03e61.
[1105400337:000965333][95E128E0] -> osm_vendor_bind: Unable to Open Port 0x2c90108a03e61.
[1105400337:000965349][95E128E0] -> osm_sm_mad_ctrl_bind: ERR 3118: Vendor specific bind() failed.
[1105400337:000965372][95E128E0] -> osm_sm_bind: ERR 2E10: SM MAD Controller bind() failed (IB_ERROR).

ib_umad is in. No kernel messages. 

I notice that it goes after /sys/class/blah blah just fine, but the in the
middle of all opensm tries to open /dev/infiniband/umad0. Is this right?  
Should it be trying to open /sys/class/infiniband_umad/umad0 (which
exists)? Should there be a symlink in /dev? Just trying to figure out the
"correct" way to do this. Or is the non-sys name usage a hangover in
opensm from the old days?

thanks

ron