[openib-general] [PATCHv2][RFC] kDAPL: use cm timers instead of own

[Tom Duffy]

On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 11:44 -0400, James Lentini wrote:
> We interpreted the above to mean "give the connection protocol as 
> much time as it needs to establish a connection, but don't mask 
> errors (no path to the remove node, etc.)". For that reason we changed 
> the variable name to DAT_TIMEOUT_MAX.

Well, let's say the end node is not there yet.  Should the CM keep
trying indefinitely waiting for somebody to show up and respond?

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050608/efed208a/attachment.sig>