[openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: get rid of dat version and thread safetey flags

[Caitlin Bestler]

If you eliminate the version info how would someone test DAT 1.3 code?
Is support for 1.3 just supposed to magically appear in the mainline at
some future date without intermediate testing?

On 6/14/05, James Lentini <jlentini at netapp.com> wrote:
> 
> I think this is a good change. If we trim the dat_provider_info
> structure down to just an IA name, then we should be able to remove it
> all together. We don't have to do that on this pass though.
> 
> I have a question about the change you've proposed for the makefile:
> 
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > Index: dat/Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > --- dat/Makefile      (revision 2588)
> > +++ dat/Makefile      (working copy)
> > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> >
> > EXTRA_CFLAGS += \
> > -    -Idrivers/dat            \
> > -    -Werror
> > +    -I$(obj)
> 
> Is $(obj) the directory containing the object files (drivers/dat)?
> 
> Is the -Werror flag already being setup by kbuild?
> 
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_DAT) += dat.o
> >
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>