[openib-general] [PATCH] process locked in D state.

[Roland Dreier]

    Gleb> Yes, but don't forget the first part of my patch (for
    Gleb> libibverbs/src/device.c) I think it should be applied to.

Yes, I guess it makes sense.

> -	mm = get_task_mm(current);

    Gleb> Are you sure that ib_umem_account will run on behalf the
    Gleb> process that schedules it?  Anyway you are correctly using
    Gleb> work->mm in the rest of the function so this line should be
    Gleb> dropped I think.

The '-' at the beginning of the line means it is being deleted in the
patch!  Of course schedule_work() delegates the work to a different
process so the get_task_mm() must be done in the original process.

 - R.