[openib-general] [PATCH] user_mad: In send_handler, only queue_packet on timeout if not response

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 16:29, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Hal> I still think there's a semantic difference with timeouts
>     Hal> which needs more consistency.
> 
> Could you elaborate?  What are the different situations where timeouts
> behave differently?

Sean has responded that (since RMPP provides reliability) there is value
in indicating when an RMPP MAD is not acknowledged.

-- Hal