[openib-general] comments on DAT registry in OpenIB

[Woodruff, Robert J]

Christoph wrote,
>On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:38:45AM -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>> actual code requirements makes no sense. If you
>> can't come up with something that remains acceptable
>> to the broader community of DAT users then you should
>> refrain from using the "dat_" symbols and their already
>> established meanings.

>That's exactly what I proposed.  Please read the mail again.

I think that your suggestion to s/DAT/RDMA makes sense, since this
code is quickly becoming "the" RDMA transport 
independent interface for Linux, rather than
trying to RNIC-PI unionize the IB core layer to make it 
support both IB and iWarp.