[openib-general] comments on DAT registry in OpenIB

[Sean Hefty]

Sean Hefty wrote:
> Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> 
>> We have to keep in mind that DAT was designed for a broader
>> purpose than what is proposed for "RDMA verbs". It was designed
>> to support transport *and* OS neutral applications that could
>> be migrated easily in a number of ways: transport, form OS to
>> OS, from user to kernel, etc.
> 
> 
> Cod that's OS neutral is nice.  It just doesn't belong in the Linux kernel.

Before I get another fish comment... "Code" even...  :)