[openib-general] kDAPL location?

[Tom Duffy]

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:37 -0500, James Lentini wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> My original plan was to branch as you suggested, but I was warned that 
> maintaining synchronization with the base code line would be 
> difficult.
> 
> We don't anticipate needing to make substantial driver modifications 
> for DAPL. I'd be surprised if more than a handful of files (< 10) 
> changed. Currently only the Makefile and Kconfig need to be updated.
> 
> Given that, does Libor's suggestion to place the code in gen2/users 
> make sense or would you still recommend a full branch?

Really, it is up to you.

It makes it easier for *me* to play with DAPL if I can checkout a whole
tree into drivers/infiniband that will compile kDAPL properly than to
pull this from here and that from there and then patch with this.

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050329/41f8e365/attachment.sig>