[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] IPoIB: Set hardware header on packet receive
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Wed Mar 30 06:35:03 PST 2005
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 12:45, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hal> I was wondering about this myself as to whether this matters
> Hal> or not. Other drivers determine this from the destination
> Hal> MAC address. Does it affect the incoming delivery if more
> Hal> than one process is receiving an IP broadcast or multicast ?
> Hal> I didn't chase it all the way down in the Linux kernel. Do
> Hal> you know ?
>
> There's a lot of places where the field is checked.
I see it set in a number of places but not checked much in the kernel.
> However all the
> ones I've seen are just ignoring packets that aren't PACKET_HOST or
> sometimes looking for PACKET_LOOPBACK packets. So PACKET_BROADCAST or
> PACKET_MULTICAST may be checked somewhere but I'm not aware of
> anywhere that they are.
Is this used by netfilter ?
Does this make a difference to any of the routing protocols ?
Has anyone run IP unicast routing using (one or more) IPoIB interfaces ?
What about multicast ? Do we care about these ?
-- Hal
More information about the general
mailing list