[openib-general] Re: How about ib_send_page() ?
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at mellanox.co.il
Mon May 16 23:15:41 PDT 2005
Quoting r. Roland Dreier <roland at topspin.com>:
> Subject: Re: How about ib_send_page() ?
>
> Jeff> (side note: it would seem IPoIB could be re-written to
> Jeff> dramatically improve it's performance).
>
> Out of curiousity, what would the rewrite change to obtain better
> performance?
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
I have some ideas worth investigating:
1. I think an option to enable zero copy would help for the send side.
This means we have to set NETIF_F_NO_CSUM so it likely cant be done
with current hardware without breaking IPoverIB spec compliance,
but we dont need a spec just to write code.
2. I dont think NAPI was ever tried on gen2 code. Worth a try?
Might help more in combination with (1).
3. There's a draft for connected mode. That would increase the MTU
and so help the receive side as well.
--
MST - Michael S. Tsirkin
More information about the general
mailing list