[openib-general] CM private data

[Sean Hefty]

Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> In any event, if no support is going to be provided for
> private data on the second it_ep_accept at the verb
> layer then that should be explicitly documented, and
> I'd suggest sending a 'heads up' to the IT-API authors,

To clarify, I was only trying to determine when to implement this, not if. 
Based on the feedback, I will try to fix this as part of my next set of 
changes to the CM.

Thanks,
Sean