[openib-general] Re: kDAPL needs less files

[James Lentini]

Patches are easy for me to work with, but I'm flexible.

I'll get the ball rolling. In revision 2475, I merged the PZ files 
into a single file, dapl_pz.c.

As you merge files, you can also call the relevant ib verbs directly, 
instead of using the intermediate layer defined in dapl_openib_util.h. 
If you don't have time to do it, I can before I check in the changes.

I'd suggest starting with the memory subsystem. Do you want to do the 
lmr files?

james

On Tue, 24 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:53 -0400, James Lentini wrote:
>> I agree Tom. I think the easiest way to do this is one subsystem at a
>> time. To avoid us duplicating work, how responding on this thread with
>> the subsystem(s) you would like to merge.
>
> I guess we can do it one subsystem at a time.  Do you want patches?  Is
> this the best way to do it?
>
>> On a somewhat related topic, the DAPL linked list implementation
>> should be removed in favor of the Linux implementation.
>> That would allow us to remove the dapl_llist.c file.
>
> Started looking into this, but got side tracked on timer issues.
>
> -tduffy
>