[Rdma-developers] Re: [openib-general] OpenIB and OpenRDMA: Convergence on common RDMAAPIs and ULPs for Linux

[Tom Duffy]

On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:13 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:56:58PM -0700, Bob Woodruff wrote:
> > kDAPL is intended as a kernel-level API
> > for RDMA enabled fabrics. As it was initially written,
> > it does not meet the Linux coding style and that is why
> > it is being totally reworked as we speak to meet that goal. 
> 
> The codingstyle alone isn't the problem.  The whole design philosophy
> is rather odd.

As one of the people trying to clean up kDAPL, I would like to know what
you think, from a design philosophy, is wrong with it.  We *can* correct
any daim bramaged parts.

Thanks,

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050531/48e34df0/attachment.sig>