[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] Opensm - wrong assertions in error callbacks
Yael Kalka
yael at mellanox.co.il
Tue Nov 22 23:06:09 PST 2005
Hi Hal,
You are correct. The Notices are requests. Then the assertion on the
resp_expected
should be removed from the osm_sa_mad_ctrl.c.
Thanks,
Yael
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:14 PM
To: Yael Kalka
Cc: openib-general at openib.org; Eitan Zahavi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opensm - wrong assertions in error callbacks
Hi Yael,
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 07:19, Yael Kalka wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> I saw that in the send_err_callback functions both in osm_sa_mad_ctrl
> and in osm_sm_mad_ctrl are wrong. I assume we haven't encountered
> these problems since we haven't encountered send errors on debug
> mode...
One question about this below:
> In osm_sa_mad_ctrl - all mads should be with resp_expected == FALSE
> (and not TRUE), as these are all responses.
What about SA Notices ? Aren't they requests from the perspective of the
SA ?
> In osm_sm_mad_ctrl - we can send both requests and responses (for
> SMInfo, for example), so no use in checking the resp_expected flag.
> This patch fixes these issues.
-- Hal
More information about the general
mailing list