[openib-general] Timeline of IPoIB performance
Matt Leininger
mlleinin at hpcn.ca.sandia.gov
Wed Oct 12 18:24:32 PDT 2005
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 11:28 -0700, Matt Leininger wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:53 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Herbert> Try reverting the changeset
> >
> > Herbert> 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc
> >
> > Herbert> which lies between these two points and may be relevant.
> >
> > Matt, I pulled this out of git for you. I guess Herbert is suggesting
> > to patch -R the below against 2.6.12-rc5:
> I applied your patch suggest by Herbert:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openib-general%40openib.org/msg11415.html
>
I backed out this patch out of a few other kernels and always see a
performance improvement. This gets back ~50-60 MB/s of the 90-100 MB/s
drop off in IPoIB performance.
Is it still worth testing the TSO patches that Herbert suggested for
some of the 2.6.13-rc kernels?
Thanks,
- Matt
All benchmarks are with RHEL4 x86_64 with HCA FW v4.7.0
dual EM64T 3.2 GHz PCIe IB HCA (memfull)
Kernel OpenIB msi_x netperf (MB/s)
2.6.14-rc4 in-kernel 1 434 (backed out patch)
2.6.14-rc4 in-kernel 1 385
2.6.13.2 svn3627 1 446 (backed out patch)
2.6.13.2 svn3627 1 386
2.6.13.2 in-kernel 1 394
2.6.12.5 in-kernel 1 464 (backed out patch)
2.6.12.5 in-kernel 1 402
2.6.12-rc6 in-kernel 1 470 (backed out patch)
2.6.12-rc6 in-kernel 1 407
2.6.12-rc5 in-kernel 1 474 (backed out patch)
2.6.12-rc5 in-kernel 1 405
2.6.9-11.ELsmp svn3513 1 425 (Woody's results, 3.6Ghz EM64T)
More information about the general
mailing list