[dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol

[Davis, Arlin R]

Yes, 48 bytes would be sufficient.

 

________________________________

From: Kanevsky, Arkady [mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at netapp.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:32 AM
To: Davis, Arlin R; dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; Grant Grundler
Cc: swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org
Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP
emulationprotocol

 

Arlin,

just to clarify, Intel MPI will not have problems with useing less than
64 bytes

of private data.

If a solution will provide you with 48 bytes of private data will it be
sufficient?

Arkady

 

 

Arkady Kanevsky                     email: arkady at netapp.com

Network Appliance                   phone: 781-768-5395

375 Totten Pond Rd.                 Fax: 781-895-1195

Waltham, MA 02451-2010         central phone: 781-768-5300

 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Davis, Arlin R [mailto:arlin.r.davis at intel.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:30 AM
	To: dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; Grant Grundler
	Cc: swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org
	Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP
emulationprotocol

	Arkady,

	 

	Intel MPI (real consumer of uDAPL) has no problem with this
change.

	 

	-arlin

	 

	
________________________________


	From: dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kanevsky, Arkady
	Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:40 AM
	To: Grant Grundler; Caitlin Bestler
	Cc: Roland Dreier; swg at infinibandta.org;
dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; openib-general at openib.org
	Subject: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP
emulation protocol

	 

	Grant,
	The developers of the application(s) in questions are aware of
the
	discussion.
	I will leave it to them to respond.
	
	I bring the discussion point at the weekly DAT Collaborative
meeting
	which we have every Wednesday.
	
	I appologize that the DAT Collaborative charter does not allow
	to submit contribution without joining DAT Collaborative.
	But this is no different from Linux not accepting any
contrubutions
	without proper license.
	Byt be rest assure that as a Chair I bring the concerns
	and suggestions stated in email discussion at the DAT meetings.
	
	Arkady
	
	Arkady Kanevsky                       email: arkady at netapp.com
	Network Appliance                     phone: 781-768-5395
	375 Totten Pond Rd.                  Fax: 781-895-1195
	Waltham, MA 02451-2010          central phone: 781-768-5300
	
	
	
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Grant Grundler [mailto:iod00d at hp.com] 
	> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:02 PM
	> To: Caitlin Bestler
	> Cc: Grant Grundler; Roland Dreier; Kanevsky, Arkady; 
	> swg at infinibandta.org; dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; 
	> openib-general at openib.org
	> Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulation protocol
	> 
	> 
	> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:40:54PM -0700, Caitlin Bestler
wrote:
	> > > Roland (and the rest of us) would like to see someone name
a
	> > > real consumer of the proposed interface. ie who depends on

	> > > this change?
	> > > Then the dependency for that use/user can be discussed and

	> > > appropriate tradeoffs made. Make sense?
	> > 
	> > Unfortunately not every application that is under 
	> development, or even 
	> > deployed, can be discussed in a google-searchable public 
	> forum. That 
	> > especially applies to user-mode development.
	> 
	> Well, this is open source. While I don't want to preclude 
	> closed source developement, it's usually necessary to have an 
	> open source consumer that any open source developer can test
with.
	> 
	> > So I could have actually tested such applications and still
not be 
	> > free to cite them here.
	> 
	> Understood. I'm not asking *you* to cite one unless you
	> happen to own one of the consumers. 
	> 
	> > With any luck some of them
	> > are following the discussion and will jump in on their own. 
	> > Unfortunately, since they are developing to uDAPL they are 
	> unlikely to 
	> > be following this discussion.
	> 
	> It doesn't help that the DAT yahoo-groups.com mailing list is 
	> rejecting my replies.  It would be helpful if someone 
	> following this forum could share Roland's question with DAT 
	> mailing list if it didn't make it there already and possibly 
	> explain why naming a consumer is necessary.
	> 
	> hth,
	> grant
	> 

	
________________________________


	YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

	 

	*	 Visit your group "dat-discussions
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dat-discussions> " on the web.
		  
	*	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
		 dat-discussions-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<mailto:dat-discussions-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

		  
	*	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 

	 

	
________________________________


	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20051019/4aa7bd1d/attachment.html>