[dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol

[Kanevsky, Arkady]

The updated proposal will have IP addresses and TCP ports of src and dst
in private data.

How TCP ports are mapped to IB service IDs is a separate proposal.

Arkady Kanevsky                       email: arkady at netapp.com
Network Appliance                     phone: 781-768-5395
375 Totten Pond Rd.                  Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451-2010          central phone: 781-768-5300
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:mshefty at ichips.intel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:51 AM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady
> Cc: Richard Frank; Lentini, James; Roland Dreier; 
> swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org; Davis, Arlin R
> Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP 
> emulationprotocol
> 
> 
> Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
> > I will update the proposal for IBTA based on this feedback and all 
> > other feedback posted. I will still separate private data usage 
> > proposal and port mapping one.
> 
> Again, I think that these should be in the same proposal.  
> The CM REQ carries 
> the IB transport layer address.  The goal here is to map 
> another transport layer 
> address to the IB one.  The source port is included in the 
> private data.  By not 
> including the destination port, there's an assumption that 
> it's provided 
> somewhere else in the CM REQ.  We should either make this 
> explicit, or put the 
> destination port in the private data as well.
> 
> - Sean
>