[openib-general] round 2 - proposal for socket based connection model
Caitlin Bestler
caitlinb at broadcom.com
Tue Oct 25 15:39:17 PDT 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openib-general-bounces at openib.org
> [mailto:openib-general-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Tom Tucker
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:56 PM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady
> Cc: swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org
> Subject: RE: [openib-general] round 2 - proposal for socket
> based connection model
>
> Arkady:
>
> I may actually have a constructive comment about the protocol
> (private data format). One thing I noticed is that *almost*
> everything in the private data header is available in the
> native iWARP protocol header except the ZB and SI bits. If
> these bits become part of the canonical private data header,
> then does that require an iWARP transport to use the header
> too even though only two bits are useful?
>
> Sorry if this is a dumb question,
>
I'm not sure I followed why these were needed myself.
More information about the general
mailing list