[openib-general] Re: RDMA Generic Connection Management
Roland Dreier
rolandd at cisco.com
Fri Sep 2 14:40:49 PDT 2005
James> When scsi_remove_host() returns are you guaranteed that
James> there are no SCSI calls into your code in progress (e.g. in
James> srp_queuecommand)?
I think so.
Roland> Yes, but what is the generic way?
James> The generic way would be to handle this in a common
James> layer. For the IB verbs + RDMA connection API to be as easy
James> to use as the sockets API, then it needs to make this issue
James> transparent.
I don't think the kernel design philosophy is to hide these sorts of
object lifetime issues from consumers. And my real question is how
it's even possible to handle this efficiently in a generic layer.
If you want consumers to be able to ignore hotplug, then the generic
layer needs to handle device removal even in the middle of fast path
work request posting operations. And I don't see how to do that
without changing to reference counted handles (from the current scheme
of directly using pointers). And that's going to have a serious
performance impact that I don't think is worth it.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list