[openib-general] libibat/libibcm build mess
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Fri Sep 9 17:25:12 PDT 2005
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 20:10, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hal> Perhaps there should be a libibsa ?
>
> That would be kind of silly unless there was something more than the
> sa.h include file to distribute.
Someday, there might be a user space SA. There are needs which are not
currently met or met well in this area.
> Maybe in the opposite direction it would make sense to fold libibat
> into libibcm. I suspect that there's not that much use for AT except
> for connecting.
Yes, AT is used for connecting so this might be a better approach and
eliminate a library.
-- Hal
More information about the general
mailing list