[openib-general] libibat/libibcm build mess

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Fri Sep 9 17:25:12 PDT 2005


On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 20:10, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Hal> Perhaps there should be a libibsa ?
> 
> That would be kind of silly unless there was something more than the
> sa.h include file to distribute.

Someday, there might be a user space SA. There are needs which are not
currently met or met well in this area.

> Maybe in the opposite direction it would make sense to fold libibat
> into libibcm.  I suspect that there's not that much use for AT except
> for connecting.

Yes, AT is used for connecting so this might be a better approach and
eliminate a library.

-- Hal




More information about the general mailing list