[openib-general] Re: RMPP Message Format Errors

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 06:46, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 06:33, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> > 
> >>>Is this what you are referring to ?
> >>
> >>Yes the line of interest is:
> >>__osmv_sa_mad_rcv_cb: Count = 7 = 800 / 112 (16)
> >>This shows 16byte extra in the data size.
> > 
> > 
> > Should it be 20 for the SA class header size or 0 here ?
> Should be 0. Means an the packet size should accommodate an integer number of
> SA records (after removing the headers size).

OK. There's a problem or problems on the receive side (of RMPP) to look
into but these appear OK for SA client right now.

> >>>I do also see:
> >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995667 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name: ERR
> > 
> > 0370:
> > 
> >>>ib_query failed (IB_REMOTE_ERROR).
> >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995673 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name:
> > 
> > Remote
> > 
> >>>error = IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_NO_RECORDS.
> >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995678 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name:
> > 
> > Expected
> > 
> >>>num of records is : 1, Found number of records : 0
> >>
> >>The full osmtest flow has some intentional errors injected.
> >>If it provides the "PASSED" message at the end it means that
> >>the errors were intentional and expected.
> >>
> >>Some of the flows have a special output message that wraps the
> >>errors in a section like:
> >>
> >>"vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv"
> >>...
> >>"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"
> >>
> >>We probably need to apply this convention to all the "bad flows".
> > 
> > 
> > Then is expected number of records in this test 1 rather than 0 ?

Will these be fixed ? Are these issues being documented along with other
ones previously noted ? 

-- Hal