James Lentini wrote: > Not to nit pick, but why did you use the prefix "ib_cma_" instead of > "rdma_" or "rdma_cm_"? Hi James, As I agree with the change I think it applies to _all_ the verbs. Why call ib_post_recv and not rdma_post_recv, if it is actually a generic rdma call that can be implemented over iwarp ? Guy