[openib-general][PATCH][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:32, Sean Hefty wrote:
> I don't think that they need to deal with caching.  And in looking at the ib_at 
> code, I think that caching should be removed.  

Just for clarity:

There is only a placeholder for caching in the AT API. Nothing has been
implemented.

-- Hal