[openib-general] Re: opensm and SIGINT

[Hal Rosenstock]

Hi Viswa,

On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 15:55, Viswanath Krishnamurthy wrote:
> Here is the log of osmtest failure. This was seen 150 times out of
> 2500 iterations. The opensm SUBNET UP failure is tough to reproduce.
> Saw it once in 2500 iterations. Unfortunately I did not collect the
> log on that error.

I understand but it is hard to know whether this is a known issue or
something else without a log of the failure.

> The patch worked as expected and did not see any issues with ctrl-C. 
> When I tried apply the patch, I got a failure.  (I used the patch
> command). I manually added those 2 lines.

Not sure why the patch wouldn't apply.

> Command Line Arguments
> Done with args
>         Flow = All Validations
> Sep 21 17:50:56 684254 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr:
> assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def
> ault port.
> using default guid 0x2c90200400cfd
> Sep 21 17:50:56 686301 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr:
> assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def
> ault port.
> Sep 21 17:50:56 686347 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port
> 0x2c90200400cfd.
> Sep 21 17:50:56 689963 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr:
> assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def
> ault port.
> Sep 21 17:50:56 691969 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr:
> assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def
> ault port.
> Sep 21 17:50:56 693187 [B7F026C0] ->
> osmtest_validate_sa_class_port_info:
> -----------------------------
> SA Class Port Info:
>  base_ver:1
>  class_ver:2
>  cap_mask:0x202
>  resp_time_val:0x64
> -----------------------------
> Sep 21 17:50:56 775383 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_wrong_sm_key_ignored: Try
> PortRecord for port with LID 0x0 Num:0x1.
> Sep 21 17:51:00 775320 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5409: send
> completed with error (method=1 attr=12 trans_id=0x34) --
> dropping.
> Sep 21 17:51:00 775389 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5410: class
> 0x3 LID 0x0
> Sep 21 17:51:00 775418 [B76FFBB0] -> osmtest_query_res_cb: ERR 0003:
> Error on query (IB_TIMEOUT).
> Sep 21 17:51:00 775465 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_wrong_sm_key_ignored: ERR
> 0011: Did not get a timeout but got (IB_SUCCESS).
> Sep 21 17:51:00 775581 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service:
> Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.1804289383.7793 id:0x6b8b26f
> 6.
> Sep 21 17:51:00 777143 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service:
> Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.846930885.7793 id:0x327b0554
> Sep 21 17:51:00 777143 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service:
> Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.846930885.7793 id:0x327b0554
> .
> Sep 21 17:51:04 779578 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5409: send
> completed with error (method=2 attr=31 trans_id=0x36) --dropping.
> Sep 21 17:51:04 779604 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5410: class
> 0x3 LID 0x0
> Sep 21 17:51:04 779631 [B76FFBB0] -> osmtest_query_res_cb: ERR 0003:
> Error on query (IB_TIMEOUT).
> Sep 21 17:51:04 779674 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service: ERR 0364:
> ib_query failed (IB_TIMEOUT).
> Sep 21 17:51:04 779740 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_run: ERR 00148: Service
> Flow failed (IB_TIMEOUT)
> OSMTEST: TEST "All Validations" FAIL

The final FAIL/PASS is definitive so there are real failures here. Is
this consistent or intermittent ? Does this work sometimes or always
fail ?

-- Hal