[openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

[James Lentini]

On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 12:55, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > Guy German wrote:
> > > I believe that ib_at is still a valuable module even if ATS 
> > > reverse ARP is broken, and I think we should discuss this.
> > 
> > Here's my thinking on this.  ATS is broken as you mentioned for 
> > reverse lookups.
> >   However, if we want to keep ATS, I think that ATS 
> > registration/deregistration should be integrated with IPoIB.
> 
> There was a desire expressed a long time ago to keep these separate.

I agree. Keeping it seperate is best.