[openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > On a side note, I wander whether ATS can be split into a separate
> > module so that people that dont need it can avoid loading it.
> 
> It is a separate module so I don't understand what you are saying.
> The only people needing this are running kDAPL, uDAPL, or iSER
> currently.
> 
> -- Hal
> 

I mean, make ATS a separate module from AT.

-- 
MST