[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath: Make more names static

[Robert Walsh]

On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:19 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Robert> Which of these #defines is valid in 2.6.17?  Just curious.
>     Robert> What we have in svn matches what you put in your git tree,
>     Robert> you see...  Perhaps an #ifdef until 2.6.17 goes through?
> 
> 2.6.17 still has IB_NODE_CA.  The svn tree has some iWARP-related
> changes that make it RDMA_NODE_IB_CA, but those haven't been merged
> upstream and won't be in 2.6.17.

Would an ifdef be OK?

-- 
Robert Walsh                                 Email: rjwalsh at pathscale.com
PathScale, Inc.                              Phone: +1 650 934 8117
2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200                 Fax: +1 650 428 1969
Mountain View, CA 94043.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 483 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20060404/6e352e51/attachment.sig>