[openib-general] Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
David S. Miller
davem at davemloft.net
Tue Apr 4 17:47:41 PDT 2006
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:42:20 -0700
> David> You were using an interface in an unintended way.
>
> There were a lot of opportunities to suggest a better way or even just
> raise the alarm when IPoIB was first being reviewed. And I don't
> remember anyone giving any guidance or insight into the neighbour
> destructor design the three or four times Michael raised the issue of
> the IPoIB crash and posted this patch for review....
If I thought your change was appropriate for 2.6.16 I would have put
it into that tree back then. Instead, I did not consider it
appropriate, that's why we decided to put it into 2.6.17
Nothing since then has changed the situation.
> If this patch is too risky for -stable, that's fine. But let's be
> clear that it _does_ fix a panic people hit in practice, and as far as
> I know it doesn't break the ATM build
I think it's too risky. It fixes a panic for infiniband.
I think you should not have submitted such a core networking change to
-stable without passing it by netdev CC:'ing me first.
More information about the general
mailing list