[openib-general] Re: the cma is not in the for-2.6.18 branch of the git tree
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Wed Apr 5 10:09:22 PDT 2006
Or> As part of the work to push iser for 2.6.18 I am going to send
Or> RFC on it to linux-scsi (and ofcourse resend RFC to
Or> open-ib). To have the people who review it in linux-scsi being
Or> able to compile iser, they would need rdma_cm.h and the
Or> associated changes in whatever (eg ib_cm.h) under
Or> include/rdma.
Or> I see now that there's also rdma_cm branch at the git tree,
Or> but i was thinking that if you agree that the kernel cma is
Or> ready for upstream, it makes sense to me that the for-2.6.18
Or> branch would have it.
Yes, makes sense. I think there have been some updates and fixes to
CMA code (loopback handling, etc). Sean, when you get a chance, can
send me updates for the rdma_cm branch? Even a single rolled-up patch
against the head of that branch is fine -- it's easy for me to split
up and update the individual patches.
For iSER review purposes, I think the rdma_cm branch should be OK
for the time being.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list