[openib-general] Re: Dual Sided RMPP Support as well as OpenSM Implications
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Mon Apr 10 13:23:28 PDT 2006
Hal> It certainly is more deterministic if there is an ABI version
Hal> change in that the errors can be disambiguated better but is
Hal> it required if an ioctl is added or alternatively
Hal> rmpp_version bit is "stolen" ?
I'm pretty confused. What would the ioctl do? Return a bit saying
whether or not dual-sided RMPP is supported? What would happen if an
old app that didn't know about dual-sided RMPP ran and didn't perform
the ioctl?
I guess this isn't really an ABI change -- old binaries continue to
run as long as they don't try dual-sided RMPP (which doesn't work now).
So maybe the answer is /sys/class/infiniband_mad/dual_sided_rmpp?
An ioctl for something that is not attached to a file descriptor isn't
really the right thing.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list