[openib-general] [RFC] AT and user AT

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:00, James Lentini wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> 
> > As AT and user AT have been obsoleted (and superceeded by CMA which 
> > is now in the process of going upstream), any objections to removing 
> > AT and user AT from the trunk ? If I don't hear back by COB Friday, 
> > I will presume this is OK.
> 
> I'm in agreement with moving this off of the trunk. 
> 
> Will the code still be available for reference?

Sure. I can move it somewhere before deleting it from the trunk.

-- Hal