[openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] opensm: updates file and up/downrouting engines

[Eitan Zahavi]

Hi Hal,

Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Eitan,
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 08:25, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>   
>> Hi Hal,
>>
>> I just run one iteration of the simulation regression against the git tree:
>> The Multicast fails on the change of format of osm.mcfdbs
>>     
>
> Is this change in OFED 1.1 too ? If so, can the validation be enhanced
> to handle the empty MLID case ? 
>   
The current format (broken) where multiple MLIDs apear on one line is 
harder to manage.
I will also need to change ibutils to generate the new format.Whenever 
such a format change
I have to chase it through whatever utility is out there that breaks.
I do not see any reason why it had to change. I understand it was broken 
by the fix that eliminate the need for
opening the file and appending to it.
Instead of modifying ibutils and the simulator tests I propose to fix it 
back to what it was
using the patch I provided.

>   
>> The Stability flows failed on the change of subnet.lst to osm-subnet.lst ...
>>     
>
> Yes, this patch went out on the list on 11/29 and committed on 11/30.
> We had agreed this would be done after SC. Can the verification be
> changed to look for this file so this doesn't fail ?
>   
Yes this is a simple fix and it was already pushed into ibutils. I 
missed the simulator tests and pushed the change today.
> It also indicated that a similar change is needed to ibutils
> Has that been done ?
>   
Yes ibutils modified to accommodate for this change.
> -- Hal
>
>   
>> doing another loop: run=0 cron=0 hour=14
>> OsmStress IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> LidMgr IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> LidMgr IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> LidMgr IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> LidMgr IS3-128.topo ... PASS
>> Multicast IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Multicast IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Multicast IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Multicast IS3-128.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Multicast IS3-loop.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Stability IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Stability IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Stability IS1-16.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Stability IS3-128.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> Stability IS3-loop.topo ... FAIL (sleeping 10)
>> OsmTest IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> OsmTest IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> OsmTest IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> OsmTest IS3-128.topo ... PASS
>> OsmTest IS3-loop.topo ... PASS
>> Pkey IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> Pkey IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> Pkey IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> Pkey IS3-128.topo ... PASS
>> OsmStress IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> OsmStress IS1-16.topo ... PASS
>> OsmStress IS3-128.topo ... PASS
>>
>>
>> Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>>     
>>> Run against SVN.
>>> Will move to GIT today (hopefully  - if I am able to git clone without
>>> password ...)
>>>
>>> Eitan Zahavi
>>> Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect
>>> Mellanox Technologies LTD
>>> Tel:+972-4-9097208
>>> Fax:+972-4-9593245
>>> P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:12 PM
>>>> To: Eitan Zahavi
>>>> Cc: openib-general at openib.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] opensm: updates file and
>>>> up/downrouting engines
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 05:39, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:30, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> This updates "file" and "updn" (up/down) routing engines which
>>>>>>>> should work properly now with changed LFT setup mechanism.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Thanks. Applied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Are these patches inserted into SVN or GIT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Ignore this - just cloned GIT and its there
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Were your latest regressions run against svn or git clone ?
>>>>
>>>> -- Hal
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>> Eitan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> -- Hal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> openib-general mailing list
>>>>>>> openib-general at openib.org
>>>>>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, please visit
>>>>>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> openib-general mailing list
>>>>>> openib-general at openib.org
>>>>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, please visit
>>>>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openib-general mailing list
>>> openib-general at openib.org
>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>