[openib-general] OpenSM Issues of the last couple days
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Sat Dec 9 10:03:44 PST 2006
On 16:35 Sat 09 Dec , Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:42, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> >
> >> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Eitan,
> >>>
> >>> Just wanted to close the loop on the OpenSM issues of the last couple
> >>> days.
> >>>
> >>> 1. When can you supply an OpenSM verbose log for the InformInfo
> >>> subscribe problem you reported earlier today ? Failing that, I don't
> >>> know how to reproduce this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Attached
> >>
> I will need to look into it in greater details. Might be a simulator flow issue. But I am not sure.
>
> >>> 4. I encourage you to look at and comment on the OpenSM patches rather
> >>> than waiting for them to be in the tree.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I am sure you did not mean to, but now I have to admit my limited skills
> >> in catching bugs by reading patches :-( .
> >>
> >
> > Not just read, but they are there to try out as well.
> >
> I will need an automatic flow for that sake. I can not keep up with the
> amount of patches manually.
> But I do not know how to automatically convert the mails into patches
> into a tree.
As stated in other post with git it is simple - git-am applies mbox just
fine.
Sasha
> > You could try out the patches and do the same thing before they are
> > committed.
> >
> >
> I have automation based on the committed tree that pull it (git trem) ,
> compile and run regression.
> Actually this is how all other code is handled too.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
More information about the general
mailing list