[openib-general] OpenSM Issues of the last couple days
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Sun Dec 10 08:20:55 PST 2006
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 01:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Eitan, how is it hard for you to prepare procmail's rule which
> will
> > > > automatically apply the patches from emails to the local
> pre-trunk
> > > > tree? Or do you think it is insufficient?
> > >
> > > This sounds like a fragile process. It seems much easier to just
> > > have an unstable branch with untested patches. No?
> >
> > Untested is an overexaggeration. They are tested but not by Eitan's
> > regression.
>
> Sorry, I'm not trying to influence any policy decisions here,
> I'm coming purely from git angle. *If* you want Eitan to test and Ack
> some
> patches, *and want to automate the testing part*, the simplest thing
> to do is to
> apply them on some git branch.
Couldn't he also back off the head on the "trunk" if that doesn't work
too ? That (which version) could be taken as input to the automatic
regression with less overhead than another branch to have to track or
figuring out how to apply patches automagically.
-- Hal
> --
> MST
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list